Donald Trump confirmed that the U.S. has launched “major combat operations” in Iran through an eight-minute video posted on Truth Social early this morning, following reports of explosions in downtown Tehran. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) also reported conducting a “pre-emptive attack” on Iranian targets.

Body language expert Judi James analyzed Trump’s speech and noted that his clothing and posture were carefully chosen to project an image of strength and energy. “Although the hat and open-neck shirt might seem casual, they are part of a broader effort to convey youthfulness and determination,” James explained. She added that the low-hanging hat partially shadows his eyes, giving him a more focused, intense look, while his sunlit cheeks and grip on the lectern create a stance that communicates power.

James also pointed out specific gestures and expressions in the speech. “His torso bristles when expressing indignation, and words like ‘Iranian’ and ‘vicious’ are delivered with a bite or sneer, signaling aggression and resolve,” she noted.

Trump framed the operation as a measure to neutralize threats to U.S. national security, including ballistic missiles. In his statement, he said: “Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime a vicious group of very hard, terrible people.” He added: “We are undertaking a massive and ongoing operation to prevent this radical dictatorship from threatening America. We will destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground.”

According to James, the speech appeared designed more as a show of force than a simple update for the American public. The dark background of the video reinforced this tone, giving the announcement a serious, threatening feel.

Trump emphasized U.S. concern for Iranian citizens, urging them to rise against their government, while using gestures and vocal emphasis to signal exasperation and authority. James observed that his extended arm movements, repeated phrases, and forceful vocal delivery were all meant to convey a “battle leader” persona and highlight the urgency of his message on nuclear threats.

She concluded that the speech ended with an implied command of submission aimed at Iran, delivered with loud, assertive gestures to reinforce power and authority.